The aim of the study is to develop methodological assessment tools for assessing the scientific and technological risks of manufacturing enterprises technological integration. Key provisions of the theory of management, the theory of organization, and modern risk theories were chosen as fundamental research methods. The methodological basis was made up of instrumental, process, resource and matrix approaches. A wide range of research methods were used in the study: descriptive method, method of generalization and abstraction, method of classification and argumentation, and analytical and graphical method. The theoretical results of the study are the disclosure of key criteria that should comply with the methodology for assessing the scientific and technological risks of participants in technological integration. Theoretical justification of classification characteristics of scientific and technological risks is given, that allows to identify advantages of quantitative assessment of risk situation. The practical results of the study are analytical assessment of scientific and technological risks of technological integration of manufacturing enterprises, based on quantitative methods. A method of assessing scientific and technological risks is proposed, it will be based on the analysis of risk events in order to identify the possible amount of damage from the onset of these risk events and the likelihood of their occurrence. The advantages of the proposed methodology for quantifying scientific and technological risks related to the possibility of regulating the classification of risks available to participants in technological integration are justified. The classification of scientific and technological risks allows to expand the range of analyzed risks for the participants of technological integration, as well as to apply operational monitoring to identify new risk areas.

Read online

Download this PDF file

Read online

Download this PDF file

Chung, Ch. Yo., Kim, D., Lee, Ju. (2020) Do Institutional Investors Improve Corporate Governance Quality? Evidence From the Blockholdings of the Korean National Pension Service. Global Economic Review. Vol. 49 (4). 422–437. DOI: 10.1080/1226508X.2020.1798268.

Gong, R. (2020) Short selling threat and corporate financing decisions. Journal of Banking & Finance. Vol. 118. 105853. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105853.

Keynes, J. M. (2012) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge University Press. 2012. Vol.VII.

Knight, F. H. (1965) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York

Markowitz H. M. (1990) Mean Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Basil. Blackwell.

Marshall, A. (1993) Principles of economics. The Macmillan Press Ltd

Hao, XC., Sun, QR., Xie, F. (2020) Does foreign exchange derivatives market promote R&D? International industry-level evidence. Economic Modelling. Vol. 91. 33–42. DOI: 10.1016 / j.econmod.2020.05.019.

Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton university press.

Hsu, S., Li, JJ., Bao, H. (2020) P2P lending in China: Role and prospects for the future. Manchester School. Jun 2020. DOI: 10.1111/manc.12332.

Susie, M. C., Noja, G. G., Cristea, M. (2020) Diversity, social Inclusion and Human Capital Development as Fundamentals of Financial Performance and Risk Mitigation. Amfiteatru Economic. Vol. 22 (55). 742–757. – DOI: 10.24818/EA/2020/55/742.

Tohanean, D., Buzatu, A. I., Baba, C. A., Georgescu, B. (2020) Business Model Innovation Through the Use of Digital Technologies: Managing Risks and Creating Sustainability. Amfiteatru Economic. Vol. 22 (55). 758–774. – DOI: 10.24818/EA/2020/55/758.

Yang, W. Yо., Han, B. S. (2020) The Effects of Compliance Timing on Multinational Enterprises' Corporate Performance in China: An Application of Institutional Perspectives. Journal of Korea Trade. Vol. 24 (4). 71–94. DOI: 10.35611/jkt.2020.24.4.71.

Zhao, K., Huang, H. H., Wu, W. S. (2020) Shareholding structure, private benefit of control and incentive intensity: from the perspective of enterprise strategic behavior. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja. AUG 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1805345.