COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRADE PERFORMANCE OF THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, SERBIA AND BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA - EMPIRICAL APPROACH

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-0297
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economics, Belgrade, Serbia
Serbia


Abstract

The issue of measuring and analyzing trade performance is continuously relevant, significant and complex. It is particularly challenging to investigate trading performance using different multi-criteria decision-making methods. In this way, considering the comparison of a large number of alternatives in relation to several criteria, a more realistic knowledge of trade performance is gained in the function of improvement in the future by applying relevant measures. Based on that, this paper analyzes the trade performance of the countries of the European Union, Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina based on the LMAW-DNMA method. According to the results of the LMAW-DNMA method, the top five countries of the European Union in terms of trade performance include: France, Germany, Spain, Poland and Italy. In terms of trade performance, the leading countries of the European Union (Germany, France and Italy) are well positioned. Malta is positioned in the last place. In terms of trade performance, Croatia is better positioned than Slovenia (21st and 23rd place, respectively). Serbia ranked twenty-second in terms of trade performance. It is positioned worse than Croatia, but it is better than Slovenia. The trade of Bosnia and Herzegovina took twenty-sixth place in terms of performance. It is worse positioned in relation to the performances of Croatia, Slovenia and Serbia. In order to improve the trade performance of European Union countries, especially Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina, it is necessary to manage more efficiently the number and size of companies, human resources, employee costs, turnover and added value. The target profit can be achieved by adequate control of these and other critical factors of business success.

Keywords



Full Text


References


Baicu, C.G., State, O., Gârdan, D.A., Gârdan, I.P., & Țicău, I.R., (2022). Financial and Competitive Implications of the European Green Deal – Perceptions of Retail Managers. Amfiteatru Economic, 24(61), 683-700.

Berman, B. R., Evans, J. R., & Chatterjee, P. M. (2018). Retail Management: A Strategic Approach. 13th Edition, Pearson.

Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica, 25(1), 1- 20.

Demir, G. (2022). Analysis of the financial performance of the deposit banking sector in the Covid-19 period with LMAW-DNMA methods. International Journal of Insurance and Finance, 2(2), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.52898/ijif.2022.7

Ecer, F. (2020). Multi-criteriad Decision-making comprehensive approach from past to present. Seçkin Publications.

Ersoy, N .(2017). Performance measurement in retail ındustry by using a multi-criteria decision making methods. Ege Academic Review, 17(4), 539–551. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2017431302

Gaur, L., Agarwal, V., & Anshu ,K. (2020). Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach to Identify the Factors Influencing Efficiency of Indian Retail Websites. In: Kapur P., Singh O., Khatri S., Verma A. (eds) Strategic System Assurance and Business Analytics. Asset Analytics (Performance and Safety Management). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3647-2_6

Görçün, Ö.F., Zolfani, S.H. & Çanakçıoğlu, M.(2022). Analysis of efficiency and performance of global retail supply chains using integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy EATWOS methods. Oper Manag Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00261-z

Harangi-Rákos, M., & Fenyves, V. (2021). Financial performance and market growth of the companies in Hungary and Romania: A study of the food retail companies [Special issue]. Corporate Ownership & Control, 18(3), 325–336. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv18i3siart7

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Kaklauskas, A. A. (2020). New Decision-Making Approach Based on Fermatean Fuzzy Sets and WASPAS for Green Construction Supplier Evaluation. Mathematics, 8(12), 2202. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122202

Liao, H., & Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation methods for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega, 94, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.001

Levy, M., Weitz, B., & Grewal, D. (2019). Retailing Management. 10th Edition, Mc Graw Hill.

Lucas, A., & Ramires, A. (2022). Directions for management in small and medium hotels and restaurants companies. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 40(1), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.40125-821

Lukic, R, Hadrovic Zekic, B., & Crnjac Milic, D. (2020). Financial performance evaluation of trading companies in Serbia using the integrated Fuzzy AHP - TOPSIS Approach. 9th international scientific symposium region, entrepreneurship, development, Under the auspices of: Republic of croatia ministry of science and education, Osijek, Croatia, Josip Juraj Strossmaye, June, 690-703.

Lukic, R. (2021a). Application of ELECTRE method in performance analysis of food retailers in Serbia. Business Excellence and Managemen, 1(3), 84-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/beman/2021.11.3-05

Lukic, R. (2021b). Analysis of trade efficiency in Serbia based on the MABAC method. Economic outlook, 23(2), 1-18.

Lukic, R., & Hadrovic Zekic, B. (2021). Evaluation of transportation and storage efficiency in Serbia based on ratio analysis and the OCRA method. Proceedings of the 21 th International Scientific Conference business logistics in modern management October 7-8, Osijek, Croatia, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics in Osijek, 189-200.

Lukic, R., Vojteski Kljenak, D., Anđelic, S., & Gavilovic, M. (2021). Application WASPAS method in the evaluation of efficiency of agriccultural enterprises in Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, Year 68, No. 2, (pp. 375-388 ), Belgrade. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2102375L

Lukić, R., & Hadrović Zekić, B. (2022). Efficiency analysis of trade companies in Serbia using the ARAS method. 22 nd international scientific conference Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip juraj strossmayer university of osijek faculty of economics in osijek, October 6-7, 2022, Osijek, Croatia, 105-119.

Lukic, R. (2022a). Application of the MARCOS Method in Analysis of the Positioning of Electronic Trade of the European Union and Serbia. Informatica Economică, 26(3), 50-63. DOI: 10.24818/issn14531305/26.3.2022.05

Lukic, R. (2022b). Analysis of Kosovo and Metohija Trade Performance. Management and Economics Review, 7(3), 379-391. DOI: 10.24818/mer/2022.10-08

Lukic, R. (2022c). Employee costs of distribution trade of the European Union and Serbia. Business Excellence and management, 12(3), 60-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/beman/2022.12.3-05

Lukic, R. (2022d). Analysis of Investment Efficiency of Distribution Trade of Selective Countries of the European Union and Serbia on the Basis of TRUST Method. Review of International Comparative Management, 23(2), 382-399. DOI: 10.24818/RMCI.2022.3.382

Lukic, R.(2022e). Application of MARCOS method in evaluation of efficiency of trade companies in serbia. Ekonomski pogledi – Economic outlook, Vol. 24, No. 1/2022 pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.5937/ep24-38921

Lukić, R. (2022f). Analysis of economic performance of trade companies in Serbia. Poslovna Ekonomija - Business Economics, Godina XVI, Broj 2 Str 32– 53. doi: 10.5937/poseko22-37860

Lukic, R. (2022g). Measurement and Analysis of the Dynamics of Financial Performance and Efficiency of Trade in Serbia Based on the DEA Super-Radial Model. Review of International Comparative Management, 23(5), 630-645. DOI: 10.24818/RMCI.2022.5.630

Lukic, R. (2023). Measurement and analysis of the information performance of companies in the European Union and Serbia based on the fuzzy LMAW and MARCOS methods. Informatica Economica, 27(1), 17 – 31. DOI: 10.24818/issn14531305/27.1.2023.02

Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., & Božanić, D. (2021). A new Logarithm Methodology of additive weights (LMAW) for multi-criteria decision-making: application in logistics. Facta Universitatis Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), Special Issue: 361-380. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210214031P

Marques, P.A., Jorge, D., & Reis, J. (2022). Using Lean to Improve Operational Performance in a Retail Store and E-Commerce Service: A Portuguese Case Study. Sustainability, 14, 5913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105913

Maxim, L. G., (2021). The importance of efficiency of the supply process for retail companies: case study. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML), 8(4), 197-202. http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2021.1527

Milićević, R M., & Župac, Ž. G. (2012).Subjektivni pristup određivanju težina kriterijuma. Vojnotehnicki glasnik/Military Technical Courier, 60(2), no. 2, 48- 70.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Serv Sci, 1(1), 83-98.

Senapati, T., & Yager, R.R. (2020). Fermatean fuzzy sets. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. , 11, 663–674.

Senapati, T., &Yager, R.R. (2019a). Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica, 30, 391–412.

Senapati, T., &Yager, R.R. (2019b). Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 85, 112–121.

Urosevic, S., Karabasevic,D., Stanujkic,D., & Maksimovic,M. (2017). An Approach Personel Selection in the Tourism Indystry Based on the SWARA and the WASPAS Methods. Economic computation and economic cybernetics studies and research, 51(1), 75-88.

Zardari, N.H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S.M., & Yusop, Z.B. (2014). Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management. Springer: New York, NY, USA.

Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., & Zakarevicius, A. (2012). Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Elektron. Elektrotechnika, 122, 3–6.

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2013a). Multi-criteria assessment of facades’ alternatives: peculiarities of ranking methodology. Procedia Engineering, 57, 107-112.

Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2013b). MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(2), 5-20.




.